Dating group ru
If evolutionary theory “explains how warfare contributed to fitness in the course of the evolution of Homo sapiens,” as scholar Bradley A.Thayer maintains, then how can a serious Darwinist say that social Darwinism or even Zionism is really bad on a consistent and logical basis?Morality is flimflam.” Yet like his intellectual antecedent Charles Darwin, Ruse ends up contradicting himself in the very next sentence by saying, “Does this mean that you can just go out and rape and pillage, behave like an ancient Roman grabbing Sabine women? If there are no grounds for objective morality, then good and bad are also illusion. What is good for you may not be good for me, and there is no way of adjudicating competing explanations. Ruse does not really have a problem with this argument here.In fact, he moves on to say that morality “is something forged in the struggle for existence and reproduction, something fashioned by natural selection.We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law.Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace …Kevin Barrett: “It is worth noting that Russia and Iran – the two nations most successfully resisting NWO regime change – are doing so in the name of God…. You can quote me on that.” During the Cold War, the United States and much of the West argued that the Soviet Union was a “godless nation.” Last year, Vladimir Putin took that pendulum, swung it on the other direction, and landed it on the Zionist regime.Putin’s reference to Satanism was a pointed rebuke to the New World Order elites, who – though they push militant secularism on the societies they are trying to undermine – are closet Satanists.” “So, you want to worship Satan? As Patrick Buchanan put it then, “In the new war of beliefs, Putin is saying, it is Russia that is on God’s side.
The noted biology philosopher Michael Ruse once again said that “there are no grounds whatsoever for being good…. It doesn’t follow that you should be bad.” Well, duh!Thayer, of course, struggles mightily to rationally defend the thesis that “Warfare contributes to fitness” and that “people wage war to gain and defend resources” while maintaining that social Darwinists were wrong in taking social Darwinism to its logical conclusion.He says that “social Darwinists perverted Charles Darwin’s argument” and “distorted evolutionary explanations because they misunderstood Darwin’s ideas and were ignorant of or consciously chose to ignore the naturalistic fallacy.Those who use evolutionary theory to explain aspects of human behavior must recall the social Darwinists’ errors.Doing so makes it possible not only to avoid repeating errors but also to advance scientific understanding.” But Thayer moves on to make this argument: “The ultimate causation for warfare is anchored in Darwinian natural selection and inclusive fitness….warfare can increase both the absolute and relative fitness of humans…From the classical Darwinian perspective, warfare contributes to fitness because individuals who wage war successfully are better able to survive and reproduce.” Thayer repeats this thesis over and over in the course of the book: “An ultimate causal explanation for warfare based in evolutionary theory begins with the recognition that warfare contributes to fitness in certain circumstances because successful warfare lets the winner acquire resources.